Teaching is a rewarding job, allowing to contribute to the growth and development of the students. In many cases, it is a hard job that does not pay well enough to experience all the benefits; however, it is highly fulfilling to see the impact an individual makes on the future generation. ANCHA and LIOJ are two exceptionally distinct schools with contrasting curriculums and requirements for the teachers, testing unusual models of education. The factors of distinct guidelines for educators may determine one’s preference towards one or another academy, considering additional significant commitments required in LIOJ. Personal preferences and mentality can also become a critical factor in leaning towards accepting an offer in Spain or Japan due to significantly contrasting cultures.
In theory, if I were offered a position in both ANCHA and LIOJ, I would need to make a thoughtful and challenging choice, as both of the establishments provide high-grade benefits upon accepting the offer. Relying on my own character and preferences in teaching, I would most likely choose the Spanish institution due to multiple reasons. The philosophy of the school relates more to my personal, educational points of view, with friendlier and open communication between students and teachers. Additionally, the institution offers to adapt the curriculum to personal preferences, allowing to make lessons beyond interactive. The requirement for out-of-school commitments such as workshops and help with activities is a regular procedure for many institutions.
It is not the additional commitments that put LIOJ in the second place but their stricter rules and residential nature of education that make ANCHA more favorable. With the requirements to eat with the students, however, the inability to work and tutor outside the institution also appears quite peculiar to me. I would be willing to make an additional commitment in the face of teaching extra hours, including administrative positions if not the demand to connect with the pupils. From my perspective, it is forced and unnatural to expect such communication. Moreover, in my opinion, prohibiting tutoring but requiring on-site interaction with the scholars is quite illogical and contradicts the school’s culture of maximum contact with the students.
Though LIOJ offers much-expanded benefits on employment, such as bonuses on extended contracts, ANCHA has standard responsibilities, offering teachers respectful agreements. The less demanding nature of ANCHA is what makes me more favorable to taking that job, as I strongly support liberal and interactive forms of education. Another significant factor in choosing the Spanish school is the country, as I would be less likely to adapt to the Japanese mentality and culture. Spanish easy-going lifestyle and warm weather, on the other side, would only supplement my attitude and mood. Lastly, ANCHA offers non-intensive programs, which I feel are more fun, allowing for deeper creativity and engagement from the students attending, which certainly depends on the teacher.
ANCHA and LIOJ are two drastically different institutions, starting from the location and mentality and ending in the responsibilities expected from the educators. The rationale provided for preferring to accept a job offer at Spanish ANCHA demonstrates that it corresponds more to personal beliefs and teaching practices. Nevertheless, the Japanese private school is an excellent institution that provides high-end knowledge through their stricter residence-based curriculum and education. Hence, the choice made towards ANCHA is strictly based on personal beliefs, preferences, and mentality that I would be able to adapt to faster.