Political science scholars Dincer and Johnston focus on the issue of corruption in the modern political field and measure its influence on the corporate culture. Authors note that even in the most developed and democratic states the cases of corruption remain the existing elements in the political sphere. The subcultured political entities in the US tend to implement a measure of corruption cases in the news-based field. It is important to note that Dincer and Johnson evaluate a political culture in the United States as full of tensions and difficulties that happen due to the coexistence of multiple political branches within one state. The problematic side of corruption on the state-level in the US is seen through the position of the political climate. On an additional note, the findings of Dincer and Johnson talk about actions that are legal from a legislative side of things but could be seen as corrupt by the masses.
The argument about the new approach to corruption is worth mentioning as it considers political climate and culture in the first place. It is not an exaggeration to mention the growing juxtaposition between Democrats and Republicans as well as a social division in American society. The “legal corruption” is an oxymoron that has a place in US politics, especially on a state level. This text is a valuable piece of information for my discussion on political multiculturalism and corruption. I acknowledge, that there is an identified need for the discussion about the modern political climate in the United States that silences the “legal” corrupt actions. The argument about corruption in the realities of modernity is complex and therefore should be addressed from variable angles and perspectives. The formulated ideas of Dincer and Johnston add an engagement into the scholar discussion of corruption as it takes a controversial topic and addresses it on multiple levels.
Work Cited
Dincer, Oguzhan, and Michael Johnston. “Political Culture and Corruption Issues in State Politics: A New Measure of Corruption Issues and a Test of Relationships to Political Culture.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 47, 2017, pp. 131-148.